[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
ISSN::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
:: Volume 41, Issue 178 (9-2022) ::
JHRE 2022, 41(178): 63-76 Back to browse issues page
Earthen architecture, an alternative to construction industry to manage the drought crisis in Iran: Comparison between water usage in a building with three type of loading system: steel, concrete, and earthen
Mohsen Abbasi Harofteh *
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran , abbasi@yazd.ac.ir
Abstract:   (929 Views)
No precise statistics and figures are available on the amount of water consumption in the Iran's construction industry (either directly consumed water or hidden water). There is also no prioritization between the usual construction systems and the alternatives in terms of water demand. Bearing in mind the dire water shortage crisis in Iran and that the construction industry is one of the most water-consuming industries, this paper seeks reducing water consumption by selecting optimal structural system of conventional buildings in the country. The study aims to compare water consumption in the conventional steel and concrete systems with the earthen architecture, which has been re-introduced in the world and its traditional methods have a long history. Therefore, two questions are raised; first, how much water is used in the structural phase in Iran in usual? Then to achieve a suitable method (with less water requirement), the main question of the study has been raised: what is the ratio of water consumption for the implementation of conventional structures (concrete and steel) compared to earthen structures? The research method is desk study to extract the amount of water consumed in cases where there are valid statistics and in cases where there is no valid information, the elimination of standard deviation and data triangulation have been considered. The results indicate that buildings with earthen structures consume between 7 and 15 percent of their similar cases with steel and concrete structures; in other words, at least 2500 liters of water is saved in the construction of each square meter of the building.


 
Keywords: conventional building, earthen architecture, water scarcity, construction industry, water-consuming industry.
Full-Text [PDF 960 kb]   (1059 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: معماری
Received: 2021/06/24 | Accepted: 2022/09/20 | Published: 2022/09/20
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbasi Harofteh M. Earthen architecture, an alternative to construction industry to manage the drought crisis in Iran: Comparison between water usage in a building with three type of loading system: steel, concrete, and earthen. JHRE 2022; 41 (178) :63-76
URL: http://jhre.ir/article-1-2214-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 41, Issue 178 (9-2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مسکن و محیط روستا Journal of Housing and Rural Environment
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645